Either we’re fucked, or Tim Flannery has gone crazy-ape bonkers

Outspoken climate change campaigner Tim Flannery says we should pump sulphur into the atmosphere to stave off environmental collapse in the next FIVE years.

Flannery says sulphur could be inserted into the earth’s stratosphere to keep out the sun’s rays and slow global warming, a process called global dimming.

He said the process, which can be achieved by adding sulphur to jet fuel would create global dimming through contrails would even change the colour of the sky. Me thinks it would lead to acid rain too.

Aviation, which many people blame for greenhouse gas already contributes to global dimming - when all flights were banned in the US in the days after the September 11 attacks, the mean temperature around the United States shot up by a very significant one degree. 

While global dimming may be seen as the opposite of global warming  and thus a good thing, it is has it’s own negative effect on the environment in that it reduces the sun’s capacity to evaporate water by around 10 per cent, leading to less rainfall - some scientists believe it is global dimming which led to disastrous droughts in Ethiopia during the 1980s.

Flannery, admits the consequences of pumping sulphur into the atmosphere to increase global dimming are unknown - this to me sounds like a cane toad solution on a Biblical scale.

I don’t seek to denigrate Dr Flannery or be a climate change believer or sceptic - though I reckon he has certainly given some ammunition to the latter here.  However, it’s worth bearing in mind that the Earth has frozen over before, and it has been warmer than it is now - Antarctica had rain forests.

Whether or not the global warming trend is man-made or paert of a natural cycler is an argument I won’t get into here. But I do believe the planet will sort itself out and mankind has to be more flexible to nature’s evolution.

We built farms and towns to suit climatic conditions at a particular time, maybe we need to accept that this was always going to be a moveable feast,

The Warmening - now it’s serious!

Forget polar bears, more hurricanes and the melting of the polar ice caps, according to the Herald Sun, beer will be in short supply, more expensive and may taste different as climate change affects barley production, a scientist says.

Mother of God! I’m turning my computer off now.

Today’s weather is not proof that we’re all going to die!

The severe windy conditions in Melbourne has caused plenty of havoc, destruction and sadly at least one death.

Listening to talk back radio and various comments on the news sites I noticed a few people were using today’s conditions, which included dust storms from Victoria’s west, as proof, that the effects of global warming were on show for all to see.

Get a fucking grip people. It’s windy, not Armafuckinggeddon. The strong gusts were caused by a depression rising from the remnants of a tropical cyclone off the West Australian coast, that saw low and pressure system to come together.

It’s called weather you alarmist dip-shits. It’s happened before and it will happen again, regardless of climate change.

Oh I get it, climate change is working class people’s fault.

 

I’m normally a fan of The Age columnist Catherine Deveney, but I was rather peeved by her column this morning that suggested that while inner city folk were doing everything in their power to be good environmental citizens, those who live in the outer suburbs are nothing more than environmental terrorists.

Perhaps my chip in the shoulder is taking what some would construe as jest too seriously, but this is not a new opinion. It also again demonstrates how The Age thinks Melbourne only consists within the tram network.

The paragraphs I mainly took issue with are:

The aspirationals continue to build their McMansions an hour’s drive from where they work and then hop in their fuel-guzzling monster trucks every morning to pay for their five wide-screen televisions, air-conditioning to counteract poor design and petrol to fuel their “lifestyle”, which is basically shopping. Am I the only one who’s a bit happy when the price of petrol goes up? “Good,” I think. “Make those dickheads suffer.”

Because nothing will make them think, or change.

They bleat: “We can’t afford to live closer.” Yes, you can. You just won’t have a double garage, a parents’ retreat, a rumpus room, a home cinema and five bedrooms with en suites.

Let’s disect this typical blinkered, inner-city, bullshit, call-me-Mother fucking Theresa view of the world.

For starters I hate the term McMansion. It’s offensive and patronising in that it implies that a certain class of people not be allowed to live in big homes.  What’as next? Do my kids go to McSchools and thus should be shunned by perspective employers because they don’t have an inner-city school tie - who says Australia doesn’t have a class system?

People live in the outer suburbs because they grew up in the area and feel at home there or because they can’t afford what The Age will tell you are the more desirable suburbs. For Deveney to say someone can sell a $450,000 house in the outer suburbs and buy something closer to work, regardless of size, is an absolute joke and totally blind to the housing crisis.

What this smacks of to me is a reverse envy, where people who bought two-bedroom dog boxes in the inner suburbs with a view to upgrade find they can’t afford to go anywhere else and are stuck in their little shit holes with a changed set of life priorities brought on by having a family.

Meanwhile their friends, who couldn’t afford to live in the cafe belt, managed to get over the whole bullshit “location-location” con and live like kings in a house where the dust doesn’t predate Federation. 

Do they feel guilty? Like fuck they do!

So, Greenpeace want security do they?

Greenpeace mean well, but deep down a lot of its members are a bunch of narrow minded fuckwits, who use so-called good causes like whales and climate change to justify their bastardry.

Yesterday they got involved with the ridiculous protest against the well-underway expansion of Heathrow Airport claiming that more planes will add to climate change. Nevermind the fact that commercial airliners are 50 per cent cleaner now than 25 years ago and that your average Boeing 777 or Airbus A340 lets out less emissions than a 1974 Kombi van or a lentil-munching vegetarian.

In fact the exhaust if the new generation of aircraft will be cleaner than the air coming through then intakes.

Aviation is without a doubt one of mankind’s greatest achievements, but these fuckwits want to take us back to the stone ages. Heathrow needs to be extended because people want and need to use it.

Part of their protest involved four people pretending to be airline employees who managed to climb on top of British Airways Airbus. This is extremely embarrassing for Heathrow’s security people and they need their arse kicked for allowing it to happen.

Of course Greenpeace had to gloat about how slack security was at Heathrow, as though this had something to do with climate change.

But even the the dumbest protester knows that if the Metropolitan Police S019 and SAS detatchements at the airport thought the banner waving fools were terrorists, they would have had new arseholes shot through the backs of their heads - “Did I just sea a laser bea … ” SPLAT!