Man attacked at footy – with a mullet?
Posted by clubwah on August 20, 2009
I was amazed to read that a man has appeared in court for assaulting a teenager at a junior football match with a “mullet”.
Sadly the story which appeared on The Age web site does not elaborate whether or not the weapon was a fish, or a hair style of 1970s origin still in favour with bogans.
Incredibly, the word ‘mullet’ appeared in the headline link on the homepage AND in the copy of the story.
The story was soon fixed by the online editors, but not before ClubWah got these possibly exclusive screen grabs.


Click
Mac Yourselfathome said
More to the point, will Tex be performing with the Ladyboyz?
clubwah said
Damn! Now The Age has a pic of the lovely Rose Byrne instead of Tex. Would have looked much better above.
Dam Buster of Preston said
A Mullet? Sure it wasn’t a former Police Union Chief?
Lyn said
What a loser. A bream would have been a better choice. Heavier front end and plenty of spikes.
Ray Dixon said
Trying the cut, paste & replace method it reads:
” … seriously injuring a teenage spectator with a Trevor hairdo at a junior football final”
RodH said
Reminds me of this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IhJQp-q1Y1s
Clayton said
If only today’s youth were more into Monty Python. They’d be no less violent, but a lot funnier to watch.
Clayton said
Pity he didn’t hit that beer-throwing blonde bitch at the Gabba.
Rebecca said
Rex Hunt would be outraged. Why you go to the footy to sit in the stands selling and eating Dixie ice creams, with dreams of one day playing in the big stuff, not to be hit with a fish. Just kiss it and throw it back in.
Beware of Mullets | Melbourne Metblogs said
[...] Wah caught this typo on The Age’s website last week. Not only was it in the by-line but the error was also [...]